Re: Whence the Opterons? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From John A Meinel
Subject Re: Whence the Opterons?
Date
Msg-id 427F801B.7070601@arbash-meinel.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Whence the Opterons?  ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Anjan Dave wrote:
> You also want to consider any whitebox opteron system being on the
> compatibility list of your storage vendor, as well as RedHat, etc. With
> EMC you can file an RPQ via your sales contacts to get it approved,
> though not sure how lengthy/painful that process might be, or if it's
> gonna be worth it.
>
> Read the article devoted to the v40z on anandtech.com.
>
> I am also trying to get a quad-Opteron versus the latest quad-XEON from
> Dell (6850), but it's hard to justify a difference between a 15K dell
> versus a 30k v40z for a 5-8% performance gain (read the XEON Vs. Opteron
> Database comparo on anandtech.com)...
>
> Thanks,
> Anjan
>

15k vs 30k is indeed a big difference. But also realize that Postgres
has a specific benefit to Opterons versus Xeons. The context switching
storm happens less on an Opteron for some reason.

I would venture a much greater benefit than 5-8%, more like 10-50%.

John
=:->

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: John A Meinel
Date:
Subject: Re: Whence the Opterons?
Next
From: Christopher Petrilli
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL 8.0)