Re: unnesting multirange data types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: unnesting multirange data types
Date
Msg-id 427913.1623777486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unnesting multirange data types  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: unnesting multirange data types
Re: unnesting multirange data types
Re: unnesting multirange data types
List pgsql-hackers
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> I did run "check-world", but it passed for me.  Probably the same
> reason it passed for some buildfarm animals...

The only buildfarm animals that have passed since this went in
are the ones that don't run the pg_dump or pg_upgrade tests.

It looks to me like the proximate problem is that you should
have taught pg_dump to skip these new auto-generated functions.
However, I fail to see why we need auto-generated functions
for this at all.  Couldn't we have done it with one polymorphic
function?

I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: a path towards replacing GEQO with something better
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types