Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Florian G. Pflug
Subject Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
Date
Msg-id 42755EBF.40600@phlo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due
>> to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and
>> which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on
>> the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload
>> rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or
>> not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of
>> wx2.6 instead of 2.5...
>> If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable
>> release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ?
>
> Some week ago I fixed cvs so 1.2.2 will compile with wx2.6. Seems we
> should release 1.2.2 quite soon.

Would you be interested in releasing an osx version of 1.2.2 too?
If so, I could quite easily backport the build-system changes, and the
(very few) actual patches to 1.2.

But if you don't want to add a new platform with a minor-version update,
I'd safe myself the effort ;-)

greetings, Florian Pflug

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?