>
>
> Myself, I believe that software patents can be useful if the patent in
> question is properly/strictly defined ... the big thing, for me, is that
> there have been *alot* being approved that are *way* too generic, and
> that is something that needs/should be fixed ...
I have yet to see any software patent that does not have some level of
prior art. That doesn't mean they are not there but I haven't seen them.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
