Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
Date
Msg-id 4268C833.8080302@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
List pgsql-performance
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
>>[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
>>Andreas Pflug
>>Sent: 21 April 2005 14:06
>>To: Joel Fradkin
>>Cc: 'John A Meinel'; josh@agliodbs.com;
>>pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
>>
>>Beware!
>> From the data, I can see that you're probably using pgAdmin3.
>>The time to execute your query including transfer of all data to the
>>client is 17s in this example, while displaying it (i.e. pure GUI and
>>memory alloc stuff) takes 72s. Execute to a file to avoid this.
>
>
> Perhaps we should add a guruhint there for longer runtimes?

Yup, easily done as replacement for the "max rows exceeded" message box.
Added to TODO.txt.


Regards,
Andreas


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard van den Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: When are index scans used over seq scans?
Next
From: Dawid Kuroczko
Date:
Subject: Re: immutable functions vs. join for lookups ?