Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres
Date
Msg-id 425821.1712929426@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Oh my. There's a workload that completely trivially hits this, without even
> trying hard. LISTEN/NOTIFY.

Hm.  Bug in the NOTIFY logic perhaps?  Sending that many signals
can't be good from a performance POV, whether or not it triggers
spinlock issues.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Koval
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Add notes to pg_combinebackup docs