> On 19 Mar 2026, at 21:38, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> We can continue the
> discussion about reducing the cost at the same time; again, I am
> definitely not saying that it isn't legitimate to be concerned about
> the CPU cycles expended running these tests, but those CPU cycles have
> found three separate problems in two days, which is not nothing.
With that in mind it could perhaps be worth to have this as a v19 open and
keep the more exhaustive test for a bit to see if more things shake loose?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
