Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 424EBA80.8020903@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>
>
>>Also, since plPerlNG is maintained on PgFoundry, are the changes you are
>>making to core getting migrated back to the main project itself?
>>
>>
>
>I don't know, and not being a maintainer of the pgfoundry project,
>it is *definitely* not my problem.  But I cannot believe it's a
>good idea to have two supposedly authoritative CVS repositories
>for the same code...
>
>
Core is the authoritative repo for plPerl. pgFoundry
is our R&D... our Linux 2.1 versus 2.2.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




>            regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?