Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 == - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Childs
Subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==
Date
Msg-id 424DA84F.1040103@blueyonder.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==  (Martín Marqués <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==  (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
List pgsql-general
David Fetter wrote:

>== PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==
>
>As of today, the license of PostgreSQL, including all its libraries,
>is changing from the unfashionable BSD license to the more popular
>GPL.
>
>

    Fine I can't see the difference, but have you not got to clear this
with every developer past and present to get it through.

>Tom Lane has accepted a job at MySQL AB.   He announced his departure
>rather abruptly on the Hackers list yesterday:
>
>
>
>>So long, suckers!
>>
>>
>
>
>

    I wonder why?

>With the change in leadership, core team members will implement
>changes to the project.   One which has picked up a lot of enthusiasm
>is migrating the PostgreSQL code base away from C.  Bruce Momjian
>explains, "C has served us pretty well for 20 years.  But we think
>it's time to move to a more modern, and let's face it, more popular
>programming language.  With the JVM testing, and the performance
>degradation, and retraining, we probably won't do any development for
>2 years, but we figure it's worth a try."
>
>

    Ok the reason, If you think you can write a database that runs
faster than a snail in Java, you need to re-think. Tom obvouly knows
this and when to jump ship. Perl or Python would be faster!!! (And I
know I've worked in them and know the only thing slower than Java is
good old paper and pencil.)

>PWN notes that the migration to Java will affect only the query
>analyzer, executor, and storage engine.  The client tools will be
>re-written in COBOL.
>
>

    Could that sentance please be reversed I could understand the client
tools being written in Java (just about) Cobol can more than cope with a
database, its older than C,

>A new language translation set of .po files for into 1337.  w3lc0m3 t0
>t|-|3 n3\/\/ /\/\3/\/\|3rz 0f teh c0mm|_|n1t'/!!1!!
>
>
>

    Either this message is a joke, Or you have all gone mad?
    I see a postpostgres on the horizon.

Peter Childs

>== PostgreSQL Product News ==
>
>PL/APL procedural language project launched
>http://www.pgfoundry.org/projects/plapl
>
>Bricolage 1.8.7.2.9.11.0.6.201.7a released.
>http://www.bricolage.cc/news/announce/changes/bricolage-1.8.7.2.9.11.4.6.201.7a/
>
>== PostgreSQL in the News ==
>
>General Bits: http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "vinita bansal"
Date:
Subject: Re: importance of bgwriter_percent
Next
From: Nic Ferrier
Date:
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2005 ==