Jeff - Thanks for your mention below. I'm curious how PG was selected in
the first place, and whether management was conscious of it at the
time... How long does it normally take for you to do the hot-swap (if
ever)? Have you explicitly decided what PG-specific features /
extensions you will adopt? or not? Were there Informix-specific features
that you had taken advantage of? Thx - Sam
Jeff wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2005, at 3:30 PM, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> of the replies I saw only one seemed like it really fit the bill of a
>> high traffic website (Whitepages.com, if you work for this company
>> please drop me an email).
>
>
> Got the OK to mention this.
>
> Raging Bull (http://ragingbull.lycos.com/) has been using PG for years
> (going back to 7.0) to power various systems. Although PG isn't our
> "main" db yet, it is now just as important as the current Informix
> engine. We're currently migrating off of Informix to PG and hopefully
> in a couple months we'll be completely off of it.
>
> The site is pushing a few million page views/day
>
> PG is doing an average of 700 updates / minute and about 8000 queries
> / minute (these spike up to 1100 and 12000 respectively). The box
> running PG is nothing special - dual xeon with shoddy disks.
>
> We also replicate that db via slony onto a hot spare. That works
> wonderfully.
>
> I plan on writing up some more info about it when the new system is
> launched.
>
> I also go the go-ahead to release some of my nifty tools I've written
> for PG over the years.
>
> I welcome various questions you may have about it.
>
> --
> Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com>
> http://www.jefftrout.com/
> http://www.stuarthamm.net/
