Re: invalidating cached plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: invalidating cached plans
Date
Msg-id 42391192.80408@samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: invalidating cached plans  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: invalidating cached plans
Re: invalidating cached plans
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> Do we want to share plans between call sites?

After thinking about this a little more, I think the answer is "no" -- 
it doesn't really buy us much, and introduces some extra complications 
(e.g. resource management).

BTW, it's quite annoying that the planner scribbles on its input. I've 
got half a mind to fix this before doing the rest of the cache 
invalidation work. That might be quite a large project, however...

-Neil


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans