Re: proposal: less strict input of regprocedure type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: proposal: less strict input of regprocedure type
Date
Msg-id 4224.1543693741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to proposal: less strict input of regprocedure type  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: less strict input of regprocedure type  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> input value of regrocedure type should be complete function signature.
> postgres=# select 'uni'::regprocedure;
> ERROR:  expected a left parenthesis
> LINE 1: select 'uni'::regprocedure;
>                ^

Yup.

> I think so it is not necessary, when function name is unique.

This doesn't seem like a great idea to me.  It will just encourage
people to write brittle code that falls over as soon as the name
isn't unique.  Also, if you're willing to assume that it is,
why not just use regproc?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: proposal: less strict input of regprocedure type
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?