Re: Patch for disaster recovery - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Patch for disaster recovery
Date
Msg-id 421A0AF6.2060005@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for disaster recovery  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>I think the only real effect of this patch will be to confuse people
>>who are reading the source code.  tqual.c is already complicated and
>>fragile enough --- it doesn't need conditionally compiled "features"
>>that we can't even explain the use of.
>
>
> I need a note somewhere to remember where to tell people to modify the
> code to recovery something.  Do you have a better idea?  You want just a
> comment rather than a define?

A short guide to disaster recovery would be useful. There's a real
shortage of people qualified to help users in this situation. I feel
comfortable in telling them what *not* to do, but nothing more.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: was: BUG #1466: syslogger issues
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: write flat files at startup, enforce XID wrap limit