Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip kumar
Subject Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Date
Msg-id 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA913526639B1D0@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 07 January 2015 11:21, Amit Kapila Wrote,

 

>Tom has spotted this problem and suggested 3 different options

>to handle this issue, apart from above 2, third one is "Go over to

>a byte-count-then-value format".  Then Andrew and Heikki

>supported/asked to follow option 2 (as is followed in patch) and no

>one objected, so I used the same to fix the issue.

 

>Based on above, I would say we have a consensus to follow this

>approach.

 

Moved to Ready For Committer

 

Regards,

Dilip

 

 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Fix xpath() to return namespace definitions