Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Drouvot, Bertrand
Subject Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields
Date
Msg-id 41d123a2-5c67-2c92-6dca-864466989b5b@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 3/23/23 1:09 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 02:52:23PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>> This comment still has the t_ prefix as does the one for tuples_updated
>> and deleted.
>>
>> otherwise, LGTM.
> 
> Good catch.  pgstat_count_heap_update() has a t_tuples_hot_updated,
> and pgstat_update_heap_dead_tuples() a t_delta_dead_tuples on top of
> the three you have just reported.
> 
> I have grepped for all the fields renamed, and nothing else stands
> out.  However, my eyes don't have a 100% accuracy, either.

Thank you both for your keen eye! I just did another check too and did not
find more than the ones you've just reported.

Please find attached V3 getting rid of them.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Orphaned wait event