Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 41EC206F.1050801@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ARC patent  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Responses Re: ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: ARC patent  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>If PostgreSQL 8.0 is released with ARC, and then PostgreSQL 8.1 is
>released without ARC, and then the patent is granted to IBM, would
>everyone be fine if they just all switched to 8.1 at that time? Or would
>we have some kind of retroactive problem? Would people that are still
>using 8.0 in production, but not distributing it, have difficulty?
>
>
The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with
the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will
be liability for anyone running 8.

We still have people running 7.1 and once you get something
into production you typically don't just "change" it.

Basically I think the fact that we are even considering leaving
the knowingly infringing code in 8 is presenting a horrible
face to the community.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>Regards,
>    Jeff
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent