Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>>On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>>
>>>It'd be possible to have optional "automatic savepoint wrapping" in the
>>>driver,
> However I wouldn't argue if the first was implemented. The second is
> questionable due to the extra code complexity and the overhead imposed.
> How many savepoints can the system handle ? What if I have a huge
> transaction ?
That's why I said "optional" -- you'd only really want this for
compatibility with other systems.
-O
