Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp
Date
Msg-id 41E4ED74.3060409@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

> Did you get a chance to look at this? It seems to me that the quick and
> dirty solution is to wrap the index->iSetxxx calls in an 'if (index)',
> however I'm not entirely convinced that is safe given that it's possible
> to return a null index pointer to the caller (which without significant
> trawling through code I may not find all instances of).

I don't see the point catching this beyond an assert. A sane pgsql will
never return contype != p, u, or NULL unless system tables are corrupted.

Regards,
Andreas

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp