Alexey Borzov wrote:
> No, there's no step missing, I expected someone to put a "canned" answer
> in this place.
Ok, that makes sense.
> I don't think it's worth the effort to write an explanation for every
> spam piece added via our comment interface. The better approach would be
> to add a prominent warning to comment form and send a "you violated our
> comment guidelines"-type email on comment rejection.
Well, we do have the delete/reject distinction, where delete just
removes the message without sending an E-Mail, and reject provides an
explanation.
Is it worth making that message customizable, given that?
Steve
--
Steve Simms <steve@deefs.net>
http://www.deefs.net
