Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Xavier Poinsard wrote:
>
>>As you can see, the new parameters have all the same gender : they
>>are all java type names or encodings.
>
>
> What makes you think that all Java type names have the same gender in
> all languages?
Because we implicitly refer to them as type "java type name".
>
> You could rephrase the messages like this:
>
> invalid input value for type "{0}": {1}
>
> Then there should be no problem.
I will follow your advice to make it explicit.
