Joolz wrote:
>
>>I dont think the overhead in implementing such a rarely needed
>>feature isnt worth it. We need a lot more other things ;-)
>
>
> I agree. Only I think this wouldn't require new functionality, I
> have a gut feeling that this is possible as it is. Now only find out
> how :)
I think you'll find you're out of luck. IIRC there was some discussion
on the hackers list regarding a mapping layer that would let you
re-order columns. I think the decision was "too much work for too small
a gain".
You have my sympathies, but you knew you weren't supposed to rely on the
ordering.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
