I can't get too excited about this, to be honest. What I would like to
see, either in contrib or on pgfoundry, is one or more moderately
complete and well populated sample databases.
cheers
andrew
Josh Berkus wrote:
>Folks,
>
>Some issues have come up repeatedly on IRC with new users, enough so that they
>might be worth addressing in the code:
>a) new users try just to "psql" as postgres, and get a "no such database
>postgres";
>b) new users use template1 as a testing database, and then have to re-initdb
>to clean it up.
>
>Both of these things could be solved by creating an additional, non-template
>database called "postgres" at initdb. For security reasons, this db would
>be set up in pg_hba.conf as accessable only by postgres via local. It might
>not seem like it to experienced programmers, but having a "sandbox" database
>which lets you get used to PG commands would be a boon to people how are new
>to both Postgres and SQL databases in general.
>
>The only reason not to do it is space; each database takes up about 5mb.
>That's nothing to most users but could be a problem for a few. Also, it
>would create a minor burden on the fsm to track an extra set of relations.
>
>
>
