Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date
Msg-id 418B9FD2.2090607@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> 
>>I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
>>discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
>>the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
>>need to change I'll take lots more notice.
> 
> 
> I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain 
> traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB 
> backend that it uses.
> 
> I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer 
> subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups 
> and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.

I good very start point is see if cvs2svn can handle the postgresql CVS without
errors.


Regards
Gaetano Mendola




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers] fsm_ variables ...