Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die
Date
Msg-id 418A9E21.6030709@mailblocks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check ...)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom,
> (I'm rather interested to know whether any other SCMs have a better
> solution to this problem, and if so what it is.  It's not obvious how
> to do better.)
>
I've been working with a few SCM's and IMHO only one of them really
handles this really well. That's ClearCase. I'm well aware that
ClearCase is not an option but I though it could still be interesting to
know how this can be managed when done right.

In ClearCase everything (both files and directories) are "elements". A
directory is a version of an element and it contains versions of other
elements. It's not very different from Unix and I-nodes although
everything is of course versioned.

Subversion claims they handle moves pretty well. When I checked it out,
it turns out that a move is a copy (versions and all) followed by a
delete, thus maintaining version history at both locations. I'd
recommend anyone who think CVS is insufficient due to file moves to
investigate subversion.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check ...)
Next
From: Russell Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check ...)