Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I wonder if there's an argument the "persistent" TopTransactionContext should
> live under a different name outside of transactions, to avoid references to it
> working in a context where it's not valid? It's probably not worth it, but
> not sure.
Hm. We could stash the long-lived pointer in a static variable,
and only install it in TopTransactionContext when you're supposed
to use it. I tend to agree not worth it, though.
regards, tom lane
