Re: PostgreSQL on Linux PC vs MacOS X - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Jim Strickland |
---|---|
Subject | Re: PostgreSQL on Linux PC vs MacOS X |
Date | |
Msg-id | 418932AB.3060400@americanroamer.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: PostgreSQL on Linux PC vs MacOS X (Jeff Bohmer <bohmer@visionlink.org>) |
Responses |
Re: PostgreSQL on Linux PC vs MacOS X
|
List | pgsql-general |
I noticed you ran PostgreSQL on a G4. What version of OS X were you running? Is it possible the issues you were facing were fixed with the newer G5 processor? Jeff Bohmer wrote: > > We use PostgreSQL 7.x on both OS X and Linux. We used to run OS X in > production, but due to numerous problems we switched to Linux. OS X > was not stable at all, especially under load. It was also a poor > performer under load or not. > > In my tests, a P3/800, 512MB RAM (100MHz bus) was consistently faster > at all queries than a G4/1.25GHz, 1.5GB RAM (266MHz bus) for our > application. Both machines had single IDE drives. > > Another thing to consider is that you can only get ATA drives with > Apple hardware. SCSI is not available from Apple, and SCSI devices > have very poor support under OS X. If a server with ATA drives goes > down at the wrong time, you can lose data. This happened to us with > our production OS X server last year. An extended power outage ran > out the UPS battery, the shutdown script did not stop the server in > time, and we had to restore from an earlier backup. For details on > why this can happen with ATA drives, see this thread: > > <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-10/msg01343.php> > > Overall, PostgreSQL has been rock solid, very fast, and headache-free > on Linux. A complete change from OS X. Our main production > PostgreSQL server has been up for 234 days now. In that period, the > only downtime for PostgreSQL has been for planned upgrades. > > As a side note, we've also had major problems running multi-threaded > servers on OS X which run great (stable and much, much faster) on Linux. > > - Jeff > > > >> We currently are running a data intensive web service on a Mac using >> 4D. The developers of our site are looking at converting this web >> service to PostgreSQL. We will have a backup of our three production >> servers at our location. The developers are recommending that I >> purchase a 2GHz Dual Processor G5 with between 2GB and 4 GB RAM. They >> say that this configuration would be able to easily run a copy of all >> three production servers. My question is: has anybody had any >> experience comparing the performance of PostgreSQL on a G5 Mac versus >> a PC running Linux? Can anyone tell me if there are any benefits of >> running PostgreSQL on one platform over the other. Anything that can >> help me make the best decision would be appreciated. >> >> -- >> James Strickland - MCP >> IT Manager >> American Roamer >> 901-377-8585 >> http://www.americanroamer.com >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org > > > -- James Strickland - MCP IT Manager American Roamer 901-377-8585 http://www.americanroamer.com
pgsql-general by date: