Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Wheeler
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update
Date
Msg-id 4180CE7A-4FD4-466B-B4C0-CF6754DF7945@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Apr 25, 2006, at 19:36, Tom Lane wrote:

> It looks like you had something trivial as the definition of foo().

Yeah, the function call. :-)

> Try one of the actual queries from the plpgsql function.

Oh. Duh. Will do. Tomorrow.

Best,

David


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Peacetree
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Next
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs