Re: plans for bitmap indexes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: plans for bitmap indexes?
Date
Msg-id 41800D75.8040602@coretech.co.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plans for bitmap indexes?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: plans for bitmap indexes?
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:

>I think what you're trying to accomplish is better accomplished through
>partitioned tables. Then the user can decide which keys to use to partition
>the data and the optimizer can use the data to completely exclude some
>partitions from consideration. And it wouldn't interfere with indexes to
>access the data within a partition.
>  
>
Though partitioning will help, you can only partition on one key (I 
guess the ability to partition *indexes* might help here).

I think that bitmap indexes provide a flexible may to get fact access to 
the result set for multiple low cardinality conditions - something that 
partitioning will generally not do.

regards

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: plans for bitmap indexes?