Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>Probably the most severe objection to doing things this way is that the
>>selected plan could change unexpectedly as a result of the physical
>>table size changing. Right now the DBA can keep tight rein on actions
>>that might affect plan selection (ie, VACUUM and ANALYZE), but that
>>would go by the board with this. OTOH, we seem to be moving towards
>>autovacuum, which also takes away any guarantees in this department.
>>
>>
>
>But aren't we requiring that we can disable autovacuum on some
>tables?
>
Yes that is the long term goal, but the autovac in 8.0 is still all or
nothing.
