Re: Nice vacuums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Nice vacuums
Date
Msg-id 4179516E.9070207@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Nice vacuums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Nice vacuums
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> What *would* be useful is an option to turn on the 8.0 vacuum cost delay
>
>features (ie, set non-default values for those GUC variables).
>
Just curious, if I were to submit patches in the next week or so that 
added new command line options to pg_autovacuum that corresponded to the 
new vacuum cost delay features, would they still be accepted?  I know we 
are well into beta, but it's also a contrib module, and the changes 
would be pretty simple.

Thoughts?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Next
From: "Ed L."
Date:
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Re: [GENERAL] Slony-I 1.0.4 Released