Barry Lind wrote:
> Kris,
>
> How would PGDataType relate to PGObject? I have always thought that
> PGObject should be extended and used for all datatypes (not just
> extensions).
We have the problem that PGobject is a public interface, so we probably
need an adaption layer at a minimum to handle older PGobject
implementations that don't know about binary formats, streaming, etc
when they are introduced.
-O
