Re: 8.0 questions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: 8.0 questions
Date
Msg-id 416676FE.1000500@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0 questions  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
List pgsql-general
David Garamond wrote:
> Thomas Madsen wrote:
>
>> A quite impressive list of changes in version 8.0.0. ...
>>
>> But the question from me is: When is it done?
>
>
> Two words: Nobody knows. Beta cycle is usually at least 2-3 months.
> First beta is in Aug. So a release is probably Nov at the earliest.
>
>> We have a lot of 7.2.5 versions running which badly needs an update, but
>> if version 8.0.0 comes in the near future, we could surely hold out a
>> while longer and go for the top of the line.
>
>
> Unless you need a specific feature of 8.0 (savepoint, PITR, migration to
> Windows :)), it's generally recommended to use 7.4.5. 8.0's previous
> name was 7.5 and it was renamed to X.0 to reflect the fact that it is
> not believed to be more robust than 7.4.

Wait wait. All X.0 version are not believed more robust then Y.Z with
Y < X and Z >> 0

Anyway is a general consensus that the win32 8.0 version is not more robust
than his counterpart *nix 8.0  this because lot of code already mature in *nix
environment is new in the win32 one.


Regards
Gaetano Mendola




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Terry Lee Tucker
Date:
Subject: Re: when to use NULL and when to NOT NULL DEFAULT ''
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Activestate Perl and DBD-Pg?