Gavin Sherry wrote:> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:>> [snip]>>>>Of course, this is as true of functions as it
willbe of procedures. So half>>the functionality that I'm angling for to support with calling named params>>could be
accomplishedwithin the context of overloading just by extending the>>named param patch in 8.0 to cover calling
functions/SPsin the format above.>>> We cannot use named parameter notation with functions due to overloading.>
Disregardingthe idea of default values, consider:>> create function foo(i int, j int) ...> create function foo(j int, i
int)...
As I see the world ( it could be wrong ) these two functions above have
the same signature, so the second declaration shall be not allowed, do you
want put also the formal parameters names in the function signature ?
Orrible.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
