Re: Index locking considerations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: Index locking considerations
Date
Msg-id 415C853C.2050806@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Index locking considerations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been thinking more about Gaetano Mendola's report of a
> FlushRelationBuffers failure during VACUUM FULL.  I still don't see how
> that could happen in 7.4, but I do see a real related risk in 8.0.

Just another information that could help your analysis.

The index's parent is a table that implement a "materialized view" so is
heavily updated by triggers.


Regards
Gaetano Mendola



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reviving Time Travel (was Re: 'TID index')
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: obscure plperl bug