Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:41:31AM -0400, Kent Anderson wrote:
>
>
>>We are currently switching to stored procedures for a lot of our database
>>activity. The question has come up about the transactional nature of the
>>stored procedures. I was wondering if stored procedures can have
>>transactions in them or if you must start the transaction in your code and
>>call the stored procedure from there to get the safety of a transaction?
>>
>>
>
>There's only one transaction (whether it's an explicit transaction block
>or an implicit one), and the query that invokes the stored procedure is
>already running inside it. So the stored procedure always has the
>safety of it, and it can't get out (except by raising an error and
>aborting the whole thing). The transaction can only be committed
>_after_ the stored procedure has finished succesfully.
>
>
>
I am assuming that save points would still work as advertised in stored
procedures....
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting
