On 2020-10-23 10:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So maybe we could get away with just changing it. It'd be good to
>> verify though that this doesn't break existing string values for
>> the variable, assuming they contain no unlikely characters that'd
>> need quoting.
>
> Yeah, that's the kind of things I wanted to check anyway before
> considering doing the switch.
If we're going to change it I think we need an updated patch that covers
pg_dump. (Even if we argue that pg_dump would not normally dump this
variable, keeping it up to date with respect to GUC_LIST_QUOTE seems
proper.)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
