Re: BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive
Date
Msg-id 4144338.1683468308@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses AW: BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive
List pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When changing the order of the result set from "Rank" to "Reverse Date" I
> observed that "Date" gives the results from newest to oldest while "Reverse
> Date" gives them from oldest to newest.
> This seems to me a mismatch and quite confusing.
> The semantics of Date and Reverse Date should be corrected (exchanged)

It's been like that for a decade or two, and you are the first to
complain AFAIR.  Changing it at this point would doubtless add a
lot more confusion than it subtracts.

We could perhaps change to some other terms entirely, like
"Newest First" and "Oldest First", but I'm not convinced that
that's an improvement either.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive
Next
From: Hans Buschmann
Date:
Subject: AW: BUG #17924: Inverted behavior of "Date" and "Reverse Date" when searching a mailbox archive