Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>In that context, is SIGTSTP similar to SIGSTOP in that it cannot be
>>caught or ignored?
>
>
> Possibly. I've reproduced the problem here on an RHL 8 system
> (2.4.18 kernel) and I think it's a kernel bug. Points:
[...]
I can reproduce this on a 2.6.7 kernel.
I think pqsignal should be passing SA_NOCLDSTOP in sa_flags, or
alternatively that the stats buffer process should check that its child
really did die rather than receive a stop signal. The sigaction manpage
says:
> sa_flags specifies a set of flags which modify the behaviour of the signal handling process. It is formed by
thebit-
> wise OR of zero or more of the following:
>
> SA_NOCLDSTOP
> If signum is SIGCHLD, do not receive notification when child processes stop (i.e., when child
processes
> receive one of SIGSTOP, SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN or SIGTTOU).
signal(7) says that SIGCHLD is generated when a child is stopped or
terminated.
A bit of experimentation in the stats buffer process seems to confirm
this -- while it is receiving a SIGCHLD, calling waitpid() with WNOHANG
returns immediately with no dead processes.
-O
