Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
Date
Msg-id 4117.1549206733@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance  (Lætitia Avrot <laetitia.avrot@gmail.com>)
Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> The spec doesn't require the inverse functions (asinh, acosh, atanh),
> but surely there is no principled reason to omit them?

+1 --- AFAICS, the C library has offered all six since C89.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?