Re: Performance Bottleneck - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Performance Bottleneck
Date
Msg-id 4114B3CE.2020504@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance Bottleneck  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: Performance Bottleneck
List pgsql-performance
>> This value of wal_buffers is simply ridiculous.
>
>
> Instead I think is ridiculous a wal_buffers = 8 ( 64KB ) by default.

There is no point making WAL buffers higher than 8.  I have done much
testing of this and it makes not the slightest difference to performance
that I could measure.

Chris


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Bottleneck
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Bottleneck