Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour.
Date
Msg-id 4112.1571685493@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour.  ("Ghiurea, Isabella" <Isabella.Ghiurea@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>)
List pgsql-admin
"Ghiurea, Isabella" <Isabella.Ghiurea@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> writes:
> we are facing some  performance issues with same SQL running in different version  ( PG SQL 10.9 vs
> 9.5.16)returning  different results when using GIST spatial index  see bellow ,

Getting the wrong answer isn't a "performance issue" :-(

You might find that reindexing the index makes the problem go away.
Otherwise, I'd suggest inquiring in the PostGIS mailing list whether
there's any known bugs in their code for 10.x.  I don't see anything
in our commit logs suggesting that there's a known problem with the
core GIST code, but maybe there's something wrong with the PostGIS
operator class the index is using.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Ghiurea, Isabella"
Date:
Subject: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour.
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour.