Re: pg_autovacuum parameters - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum parameters
Date
Msg-id 410F9EF4.1070003@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_autovacuum parameters  ("Lending, Rune" <rune.lending@inpoc.com>)
Responses Re: pg_autovacuum parameters  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Lending, Rune wrote:

> Hello all.
>
> I am managing a large database with lots of transactions in different
> tables.
> The largest tables have around 5-6 millions tuples and around
> 50000-60000 inserts and maybe 20000 updates pr day.
> While the smalest tables have only a few tuples and a few updates
> /inserts pr day. In addition we have small tables with many
> updates/inserts. So what I am saying is that there is all kinds of
> tables and uses of tables in our database.
> This, I think, makes it difficult to set up pg_autovacuum. I am now
> running vacuum jobs on different tables in cron.
>
> What things should I consider when setting but base and threshold values
> in pg_autovacuum? Since the running of vacuum and analyze is relative to
> the table size, as it must be, I think it is difficult to cover all tables..

One of the biggest problems with the version of pg_autovacuum in 7.4
contrib is that you can only specify one set of thresholds, which often
isn't flexible enough.  That said the thresholds are based on table
since since you specify both a base value and a scaling factor so
pg_autovacuum -v 1000 -V 1 will vacuum a table with 100 rows every 200
updates, but will vacuum a table with 1,000,000 rows every 1,000,100
updates.

> Are there anyone who have some thoughts around this?

Basically, you should be able to use pg_autovacuum to do most of the
vacuuming, if there are a few tables that aren't getting vacuumed often
enough, then you can add a vacuum command to cron for those specific tables.

Matthew



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT IN query takes forever
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT IN query takes forever