Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
Date
Msg-id 40cfdd58-2940-1558-01e9-a4a80919ed88@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/13/17 06:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Attached the latest patch. It didn't actually necessary to change
> GetSubscriptionNotReadyRelations. I just changed the logic refreshing
> the sync table state list.
> Please give me feedback.

I think this is a reasonable direction, but do we really need
table_sync_retry_interval separate from wal_retrieve_retry_interval?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker