Re: pg_dump bug fixing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date
Msg-id 40FB224D.7020800@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump bug fixing  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Responses Re: pg_dump bug fixing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>No, because pg_dump itself dumps template1's contents...
> 
> Are you planning on extending this line of thought to other things in
> template1 such as operators?

Ah, I see where you are going with this....

I think that we should treat the public schema specially :)  That's 
because it is much more likely to be dropped and messed with than the 
other system objects, in fact you're encouraged to drop it in the docs.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: function return type
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Toward better documentation