Re: Memory leaks using refcursors - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Memory leaks using refcursors
Date
Msg-id 40EBB522-87F2-48D8-8CD6-B846006344B9@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory leaks using refcursors  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Responses Re: Memory leaks using refcursors
List pgsql-jdbc
Kris,

I don't see a downside to it. Once we read the data from the cursor
we have no more use for it. AFACT it should be committed.

Dave
On 18-Feb-07, at 7:20 PM, Kris Jurka wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> So I've sent Guillaume a driver which closes the refcursor
>> directly after reading the contents for testing.
>>
>> So far so good.
>>
>
> So what's the resolution on this?  Should this fix be committed?
> What are the downsides?
>
> Kris Jurka
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory leaks using refcursors
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary protocol patch v7