Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security
Date
Msg-id 40E995F6.6030309@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to plperl security  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Currently we have this in plperl.c:
>  "require Safe;"
>
> I am thinking of submitting a patch to replace this with "use Safe
> 2.09;" to enforce use of a version without the known vulnerability.
>
> Any objections?

I have none, except will 2.09 work with 5.00503?


>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plperlng-devel mailing list
> Plperlng-devel@pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/plperlng-devel


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: plperl security
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security