Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Clift <jc@telstra.net> writes:
>
>>Not sure how worthwhile others will find this small patch (to CVS HEAD),
>>but we found it useful. It adds the column comments to the
>>information_schema.columns view.
>
>
> This question has been touched on before, but I guess it's time to face
> it fair and square: is it reasonable for an SQL implementation to add
> implementation-specific columns to an information_schema view? One
> could certainly argue that the entire point of information_schema is
> to be *standard*, not more, not less. OTOH I do not know if adding
> an extra column is likely to break anyone's application. Comments?
Well, I suppose it reduces application portability if anyone starts
relying on it.
?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> regards, tom lane
>
>
