Josh Berkus wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Well, it sounds like all you need is testing. Also, it would have been nice
> if you'd brought this up a few weeks earlier. If you tell Tom, tonight,
> that you want to move PL/Java into the main tree, I think the answer's going
> to be "no" just because it's 12 hours to feature-freeze.
>
My intention was not to get it in for 7.5. Right now I'm more interested
in the procedure of getting there and if it's at all feasible to make a
submission. I think Pl/Java will be really good with gcj 3.4 and I don't
think it's been released on many platforms yet, so I'm in no real hurry.
> Also, it will precipitate an argument about whether the PLs really belong in
> the main tree at all, or whether they should be seperate. And that
> *definitely* won't wind up in 12 hours.
>
Yes, I've seen discussions about that earlier. My objective is to get
Pl/Java promoted the same way the other languages are (i.e. one of the
"supported languages"). If it's in the main tree or not doesn't really
matter.
Kind regards,
Thomas Hallgren
