> Also he said that the problem was solved with enough lazy VACUUM
> scheduling. I don't understand why he doesn't want to use that
> solution.
Because even lazy VACUUM is horrendous to performance but as I said in
a further post this has been pretty much fixed by (Jan I believe) in 7.5.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
