On 6/8/2004 11:04 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On 6/8/2004 9:58 AM, darren@up.hrcoxmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I conclude
>> >> from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody cares if we
>> >> promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship projects, that
>> >> is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation against
>> >> PostgreSQL 6.4 with no ideas how to incorporate the semantic changes of
>> >> MVCC into the concept.
>> >
>> >
>> > Jan,
>> >
>> > Perhaps you should contact the project admin or at least
>> > posting to the project mailing list, before assuming the
>> > project is dead. Admittedly there has been several
>> > delays and periods of inactivity, but declaring a
>> > project dead without investigating is quite
>> > inappropriate.
>>
>> I apologize and admit that it should have been posted to the project
>> mailing list.
>
> I assumed the top-5 projects are dynamic based on the amount of
> activity, not hardcoded as they seem to be.
>
Looking at "orapgsqlviews", which had the last CVS commit 3 years ago
and is still clinging to its top-5 position, I don't think so. Chris?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
